Loading...

Insurance Rules Can Hamper Recovery From Opioid Addiction

Written by:

at August 5, 2016

NPR is reporting on the growing trend towards Medication Assisted Treatment and specifically the now commonly used Suboxone, which helps control an opioid user’s cravings for the drug.

A body of evidence now shows that medications such as Suboxone are effective in putting the brakes on opioid use disorder, when used in conjunction with counseling.

But because of some companies’ insurance rules, getting started on Suboxone — and staying on it — can be difficult.

The story reports about “Angela” who tells of her doctor who wrote her a prescription, but she had to wait three days to get it filled. She spent those days in bed with nausea, diarrhea and muscle cramps — symptoms of opioid withdrawal. For her husband “Nate,” the wait was five days. On day three, he relapsed and used heroin.

Suboxone is covered through their health plan, which is part of Indiana’s Medicaid expansion, the Healthy Indiana Plan. But before the couple’s insurance company, Managed Health Services, will pay for the drug treatment, their doctor has to get approval from the insurer — known as a prior authorization.

The prior authorization process adds work for doctors and their staff, says Dr. Andrew Chambers, a psychiatrist and addiction specialist in Indianapolis. With the phone calls, faxing and other paperwork, he says, three of his nurses spend about 30 hours a week going back and forth with the insurance companies.

“It’s almost like when you take on a patient to treat opiate addiction, you also have to take on another patient called the insurance company,” Chambers says.

Getting a prior authorization to prescribe one of these medications can take days or weeks, says Sam Muszynski, director of health care systems and financing with the American Psychiatric Association. He says the delays leave patients vulnerable to relapse.

“You may lose that opportunity right then and there,” he says. “They may never come back.”

Muszynski and policy analysts with the federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration say requiring prior authorizations from insurers for addiction medication is a widespread practice in the U.S.

As of 2013, Medicaid in 48 states required a prior authorization for buprenorphine, the active ingredient in Suboxone. Chris Carroll, director of health care financing at SAMHSA, says that number likely has not changed much since 2013. He says treatment limitations like prior authorizations are part of “the dark shadows of the insurance industry.”

Prior authorizations are one way insurers limit what they pay for, Muszynski says, and they use prior authorizations more often with mental health and addiction treatments, compared to other medical treatments. That’s despite the 2008 passage of a federal law called the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, which was supposed to end unequal insurance coverage for mental illness as compared to physical illness.

For instance, under the Turners’ plan, insulin treatments for diabetes don’t require a prior authorization. But Suboxone does.

“It’s just totally unfair,” Muszynski says. “There’s a continuing pattern of discrimination, which results in reduced access to people who need opioid addiction treatment.”

Prior authorization requirements can also pressure doctors to change how they prescribe a drug such as Suboxone. Sometimes an insurer will push for a lower dosage than the doctor wants, or it will require a patient to start tapering the use of a medication even when the doctor thinks the patient needs more time.

“These rules and regulations for us completely block the correct provision of care,” says Chambers. “And that’s crazy.”

For some insurers, a prior authorization expires after just a few months, forcing everyone involved to go back through the process of reauthorizing. In some cases, Chambers says, patients will even run out of medicine before a new prescription can be approved, which can force them into withdrawal.

Indiana Medicaid says it has started to allow some doctors to skip that initial back-and-forth with the insurance company. But Chambers says the changes haven’t helped him much yet.

Clare Krusing, press secretary with the trade association America’s Health Insurance Plans, argues that prior authorizations are not in place to limit treatment for patients with opioid addiction. Rather, she says, they’re meant to ensure that patients receive proper care.

“Prior authorization is not just arbitrarily applied,” she says. “Plans look at what the clinical guidelines are. A plan is going to make sure that before a drug is prescribed, the patient meets those guidelines.”

Kursing adds that the prior authorizations in place for buprenorphine don’t violate the parity law, because the treatment plan for addiction is different from the treatment plan for other chronic illnesses, such as diabetes.

Nate Turner has managed to stay in treatment despite the prior authorization process. He says there’s an irony here. He started taking opioids without a prior authorization — in fact, on his plan, the pain pills he used to be addicted to require no prior authorization. He says that sort of gatekeeping paperwork shouldn’t be a stumbling block when he’s trying to quit his opioid habit.

“I can assure you, if I were on regular pain medicine, I’d be able to get them, no problem,” he says. “No questions asked.”

Click here to read more.

Tags:

SOBER LAW NEWS IS A LEGAL WEBSITE PROVIDING NEWS, COMMENTARY AND OPINIONS ON THE ADDICTION TREATMENT AND RECOVERY SERVICES INDUSTRIES. THE ARTICLES REPOSTED ON THIS SITE TAKE AN IN-DEPTH LOOK AT CURRENT TRENDS IN THIS DYNAMIC HEALTH CARE SECTOR AND THE LAWS THAT GOVERN ITS REGULATION AND GROWTH. OUR HOPE AND PURPOSE IS TO PROVIDE RELEVANT AND ACCURATE INFORMATION TO THE PUBLIC AND TO POLICYMAKERS THAT WILL HELP GUIDE THE PROVISION OF ADDICTION TREATMENT OUT OF THE SHADOWS AND INTO TRANSPARENT, MAINSTREAM HEALTH CARE. THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS INTENDED AS A PUBLIC SERVICE. ANY QUESTIONS OF A LEGAL NATURE SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO AN ATTORNEY, AND THE INFORMATION ON THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE LEGAL ADVICE FROM A LICENSED ATTORNEY IN YOUR STATE. BY USING THIS WEBSITE, YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOU MAY NOT RELY UPON OR REFER TO THE CONTENTS AS BEING LEGAL ADVICE OR GUIDANCE PROVIDED BY JEFFREY C. LYNNE, ESQ., WITHOUT HIS PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This